|
Before I get into the science of this topic, just realize that
aerobics did not become hugely popular until the late 70s/early 80s. The
studies that were coming out regarding the benefits of aerobic exercise
were funded and put out to the public by the companies that were making
the “cardio” equipment to put in all of the gyms going up around the
country. Think about the timing of everything. Gyms did not start to
become popular until this time when fitness was brought to the
mainstream by none other than one of my heroes, Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Hmm, so all of a sudden when gyms started exploding in this country,
aerobics became great for us, and studies just “happened” to coincide
with this time period? I have no problem with aerobics if the person
truly enjoys it. It can be a very stimulating experience. My problem is
with the misapplication of aerobics to sculpt the lean physique that so
many of us are after.
For those of you who have seen Pumping Iron, notice that
Arnold was in the best shape of his career, yet he performs no aerobics,
just intense weight training and dieting. When Arnold made his comeback
to the bodybuilding stage in 1980, he had bought into the aerobics
revolution also, and the physique he brought to the stage was the
smallest, softest, and out of shape of his entire career.
Aerobics train the nervous system and musculature system to become
slow. It stresses our type I muscle fibers (slow twitch and red
ones—remember this for later on). These are not the fibers that we want
to stress if our goal is to gain some muscle and lose body fat. Those
fibers are the type II fibers (fast twitch and white). So already you
can see that if you’re performing intense resistance training and hours
a week of aerobics, you’re stressing two different systems, which is not
a good thing.
Let’s examine the chicken and the duck. Now, you know that dark meat
has a lot more fat than white meat. The chicken is predominantly white
meat, and the duck is predominantly dark meat. Myoglobin, which carries
oxygen molecules to the muscle for work, is what makes the meat dark.
The duck can fly for thousands of miles while the chicken can’t even get
off the ground for more than a few seconds. Yet, the chicken is much
more muscular and lean. Ducks are aerobic, and they store fat for very
effective use.
Aerobics trains the body to become very efficient at using fat and
storing fat because the predominant fuel source in aerobic exercise is
fat. Did you ever hear of the “fat burning zone?” Throw it out the
window. It is quite possibly one of the most misleading pieces of
fitness information ever! If your car is more efficient at using fuel,
is it going to use more or less of it? The correct answer is less of it,
which is great for your wallet but not your body if we’re talking about
efficiency of fat use for exercise. We want the hummer engine, the big
gas-guzzler, the most fuel inefficient car we can find to burn body fat.
To equate this to exercise, we want high intensity exercise with rest
interspersed. We want a very large oxygen deficit. In a study by
Tremblay and colleagues, it was demonstrated that high intensity
exercise, specifically intermittent, supra-maximal exercise, is the most
optimal for fat loss. There were two groups—the long, slow distance
aerobic endurance group (LSD) that was on their program for 20 weeks and
the high intensity interval training (HIIT) group that was on a program
for 15 weeks. The amount of energy utilized (calories) by the LSD group
was DOUBLE that of the HIIT group. However, six skin fold measurements
demonstrated greater loss in the HIIT group than the LSD group. When
this was expressed on a per energy basis, the HIIT group’s reduction in
skin folds was nine times greater than the LSD group. That is what you
call more bang for your buck (Willey 2007).
The HIIT group created large post-exercise oxygen consumptions
(EPOC), which can take up to 48 hours for your body to fully recover
from. This is where fat loss occurs, not during the hours spent on the
treadmill. In another published study by R. Bahr and performed at the
Department of Physiology at the National Institute of Occupational
Health in Oslo, Norway, it was demonstrated that low intensity (defined
as 65 percent of maximum heart rate for less than one hour) led to a
total EPOC of only five calories. On the other hand, intensive exercise
where the heart rate was above 85 percent of the maximum, led to EPOC
values of up to 180 calories (Staley 2005).
As I have said in the past, the body is incredibly adaptive. What
used to take 30 minutes on the cardio equipment to burn 300 calories
will soon take 40 minutes, then 45, and then 50. What you are doing is
creating the body to be a fat storing, super efficient, fat burning
machine! Think about it. Do all those people at the gym who slave on
those machines ever seem to change? Maybe when they first start, but it
has been shown that with this type of exercise, the body becomes almost
completely adapted after the first eight weeks. Go to any 5K, marathon,
or bike race and 60–70 percent of the people who cross the finish line
are fat.
If the body is more efficient at burning and storing fat, this will
also equate to a lowered metabolism, which, again, is not a good thing.
We are looking for exercise that takes the body hours to recover from
(large EPOC). You will not even be aware of this recovery, but if you
were put in a lab, oxygen debt would still be elevated for a few hours
to 48 hours! Did you ever notice that even after running a few miles,
you could hold a conversation during it or immediately following it? The
human body recovers very quickly from aerobic exercise. This is not
optimal for fat loss.
For those of you aerobic athletes, there was another study done by
Tabata in Japan that showed anaerobic interval training actually caused
greater increases in AEROBIC capacity, more so than the group that
actually performed aerobic running! That is just a piece of information
to use when you want to switch up your training and do some shorter
duration type of stuff.
Which is leaner and more muscular—the marathon
runner or sprinter?
Sprinters such as Ben Johnson of Olympic infamy were known to go to
McDonalds and see how many Big Macs they could eat, often downing 5–6
without a problem and staying shredded. These athletes have created
those big gas-guzzling machines that I was talking about earlier. Look
at gymnasts. They never do aerobics, yet it can be argued that they have
the best physiques of any group of athletes out there. Their training
consists of explosive high intensity bouts of exercise often with
nothing more than their body weight.
In a different capacity, aerobic athletes, most notably marathon
runners, are the most injured group of athletes in the world. Every time
the foot strikes the ground, 3–5 times the body weight is applied in
force up through the skeletal system. Ouch! The stress hormone cortisol
is also produced in very large amounts when the body is constantly
performing aerobics. Despite what you see on those silly commercials,
cortisol is essential to the human body. However, high amounts will
cause the accumulation of body fat, most visibly around the mid-section.
High cortisol will also negatively impact your adrenal glands over time.
Distance runners who train upward of 100 miles per week do not expend
more than 800–1300 “extra” calories each day above their normal energy
requirements (McArdle 2001). Does that sound like it was worth their
time investment?
How do you make sure your exercise is intense enough? If you can hold
a conversation once a set or interval is completed, you are more than
ready to go again. Remember, you are trying to create a deficit. What
about the really heavy person who lost massive amounts of weight from
their aerobics program? They would have lost weight doing any form of
activity that took them out of their sedentary state. The composition of
weight lost also needs to be looked at. If you are just performing
cardio, your precious muscle is being used as a fuel source, thus it is
completely common for people to lose tons of weight yet be a fatter,
smaller version of their former self. This will happen because the
composition of weight lost will come from muscle and fat, not
predominantly fat.
Some of you might say, but Kyle, “I have seen you doing cardio and
you told me to do it in the past.” That is correct, but I also used to
have a tail and bangs for my haircut. Times change and so does
knowledge.
To wrap this up, you might be wondering why I seem so passionate
about this topic. Well, I am getting ready for another bodybuilding
show, and in years past, I too would spend hours on cardio equipment
trying to get “ripped.” Needless to say, I didn’t like my return on the
investment, and my muscles were becoming smaller due to being trained in
a slow manner. What would often happen to me from such extreme dieting
and hours upon hours of aerobics is that I would gain 30–35 pounds the
next week when the competition was over because I had succeeded in
creating the perfect “fat storing machine.”
I went through every book I could get my hands on to find a better
way. What I found was simple. Through diet and high intensity resistance
exercise with incomplete recovery (beginning the next set before oxygen
is fully restored), I’m now in my best and biggest shape ever! I perform
sprints a couple of days per week but that usually only takes about ten
minutes. Now, here is the interesting part. My back has been acting up
and going into spasms. On those days, you can still find me on the
stairmaster. Why? Because emotionally and mentally, I felt that I needed
it. I just said the key words—gym goers have become emotionally
dependent on their “cardio” equipment feeling that if they miss a
session, they will get fat. Again, think about the results you have been
getting and really think about whether or not they are worth it. Most
aerobic training is dependent upon an emotional attachment to it.
I know that many of you will be resistant to this idea, and this
concept may not even catch on in my lifetime. However, I did enjoy
making you aware of this information! If you like to run and jog and
ride bikes, great. Go for it. I’m all for it. As I said before, I am.
Activity is awesome, any kind. Just realize what benefits you are trying
to get from it. I have been studying and trying systems of resistance
training that allow me to get as “shredded” as I need to without
stepping foot on any more cardio equipment.
I hope that this issue was enlightening to you or at least
interesting. I would like to thank Scott Abel, a fantastic strength
coach from Canada, who has helped to change my view of how I approach
fitness and exercise for the better.
Kyle Newell is a strength and conditioning specialist (CSCS)
located in New Jersey. He is a physical education teacher and high
school strength and conditioning coach at South Brunswick High School in
New Jersey. He specializes in body transformation and sport specific
conditioning and is pursuing his master’s degree in exercise science
through the University of Texas Pan American. He is also a competitive
bodybuilder in addition to being a certified sports nutritionist
(CISSN). Kyle is available for online consulting. Just remember that
proximity has nothing to do with expertise. He can be reached through
his website at http://www.bodyperformancecoach.com.
Elite Fitness Systems strives to be a recognized leader in the
strength training industry by providing the highest quality strength
training products and services while providing the highest level of
customer service in the industry. For the best training equipment,
information, and accessories, visit us at www.EliteFTS.com. |
the rep counts are listed at the head...
what were the reps for each exercise ...
Horse Power
I'm glad you enjoyed it. I really lik...
Dave, What ever you call it, it is a ...